Cricketism: Should the team bowling second tale all 10 wickets?
This question perhaps haunts all cricket watchers who think the team bowling second can easily win the match by denying runs to the batboys without focusing on wickets because trying hard for wickets helps the batboys to hit 6s and 4s.
Cricketers avoid dotballs to enable the greedy batboys to score nicely and fool the public, cheat the regimes. .
Till today, no team has won a match by not taking a single wicket.
Why should bowling team take wickets to win?
Bowlers should be asked to bowl dotballs constantly- wickets or no wickets. Bowlers can be serious too. When they give a no-ball, how careful not to allow any runs for the next next ball. That should be the attitude throughout!
If there is no written rule that the team bowling second must take all 10 wickets to win, whey the hell the bowlers harp on wickets? Only to offer too many runs to select batboys, or after taking all 5-6 batboys wickets, offer extra runs to bowlers?
That is the funny trick of cricketism.
-AAR